403Webshell
Server IP : 85.143.209.190  /  Your IP : 216.73.217.12
Web Server : Apache/2.4.63 (Ubuntu)
System : Linux 49083.simplecloud.ru 5.4.0-205-generic #225-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 10 22:23:35 UTC 2025 x86_64
User : vozdvizhenka37 ( 1083)
PHP Version : 7.4.33
Disable Function : pcntl_alarm,pcntl_fork,pcntl_waitpid,pcntl_wait,pcntl_wifexited,pcntl_wifstopped,pcntl_wifsignaled,pcntl_wifcontinued,pcntl_wexitstatus,pcntl_wtermsig,pcntl_wstopsig,pcntl_signal,pcntl_signal_get_handler,pcntl_signal_dispatch,pcntl_get_last_error,pcntl_strerror,pcntl_sigprocmask,pcntl_sigwaitinfo,pcntl_sigtimedwait,pcntl_exec,pcntl_getpriority,pcntl_setpriority,pcntl_async_signals,pcntl_unshare,
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : ON  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON  |  Sudo : ON  |  Pkexec : ON
Directory :  /snap/core/17284/usr/share/apparmor/easyprof/policygroups/ubuntu-core/16.04/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ Back ]     

Current File : /snap/core/17284/usr/share/apparmor/easyprof/policygroups/ubuntu-core/16.04/network-service
# Description: Can access the network as a server.
# Usage: common
#include <abstractions/nameservice>
#include <abstractions/ssl_certs>

# These probably shouldn't be something that apps should use, but this offers
# no information disclosure since the files are in the read-only part of the
# system.
/etc/hosts.deny r,
/etc/hosts.allow r,

@{PROC}/sys/net/core/somaxconn r,
@{PROC}/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range r,

# LP: #1496906: java apps need these for some reason and they leak the IPv6 IP
# addresses and routes. Until we find another way to handle them (see the bug
# for some options), we need to allow them to avoid developer confusion.
@{PROC}/@{pid}/net/if_inet6 r,
@{PROC}/@{pid}/net/ipv6_route r,

# java apps request this but seem to work fine without it. Netlink sockets
# are used to talk to kernel subsystems though and since apps run as root,
# allowing blanket access needs to be carefully considered. Kernel capabilities
# checks (which apparmor mediates) *should* be enough to keep abuse down,
# however Linux capabilities can be quite broad and there have been CVEs in
# this area. The issue is complicated because reservied policy groups like
# 'network-admin' and 'network-firewall' have legitimate use for this rule,
# however a network facing server shouldn't typically be running with these
# policy groups. For now, explicitly deny to silence the denial. LP: #1499897
deny network netlink dgram,

Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit